| ||||||
agung kurniawan, agus suwage, alim bahtiar, apotik komik,arya panjalu, ay tjoe chirstine,bob sick yudhita,bunga jeruk,eko nugroho, eddie hara, farhan siki, filippo sciascia,heridono, ivan sogita, made wianta,mella jaarsma, putu sutawijaya, s. teddy d., samuel indratma, tema bajragosha, theresia agustina, tommy tanggara, tohjaya tono, tracy hammer, ucup, yoni halim
drawings from the stockroom The title of this exhibition adopts the term drawing to mean works that are more various than the standard signification it suggests. The art of drawing is known to one since childhood and it doesn’t seem to take any sophisticated concept, discourse or talent to recognize and interpret a drawing. The discussion around drawing is only getting complicated as artists start to question it and experiment with possible connections between form, content and medium so that drawing may have new notions and weight. For example, in Indonesia we see the tendency to use the term gambar (meaning drawings, pictures) so loosely that it blurs the true meaning and reference, and even distances us from the very realm of drawing. Before the word film gained its increasing popularity, the Indonesian word for film ( the cinema ) had been gambar bioskop or gambar hidup that is – more or less – equivalent with motion pictures. Generally speaking, drawings restrain from making abstractions so they can escape ideas that are too formal. A drawing offers figures easily recognizable since it invariably recalls images found in real life through representations that keep sending out currents of narrative ideas. The fluid nature of drawings pleases us as it reminds us, perhaps, of the way children absorb and throw up reality through simple schemes they make. Drawing also stands witness to the most ancient form of speech in which the visual was undoubtedly more effective than the verbal, not in terms of conceptual or linguistic sophistication but, rather, for offering a distinct logic in representing things. The affective potency of drawing is easy for us to absorb; and apparently the experience of viewing a drawing testifies once again the mimetic tendency at the bottom of our experience as human beings. It is apparent how the drawings shown here lie in between the artists’ expression and the banal objects such as books, banners, illustrations, envelopes, packages, and embroidery. While the form is easily recognizable, the content is a fragmental idea that is modestly repeated to show how hard it is to regain the continuity between ideas in art and life, between representation and reality. In that very sense, drawing is rich in characteristics and options. It also appears as pure expression before shifting into a form of art based on some complicated discourse or pretentiously so. |
||||||